It's mainly that the storage options are still super limited. I love the A1, I just don't know if I would want to deal with 61MP files shot at 30fps. I don't even consider fix large body design. Modular compact and fix large body cameras performance are close. The canon and Nikon large bodies only offer single large capacity battery i.e.
I compare R3 against 1DX, D5/6, EM1X, GFX100. I want to have one grip and use it with different bodies from the manufacturer. Sony main change to body and grip design follows a generation cycle. Sony started that trend and great to see Canon and Nikon following similar trend. Manufacturers should limit developing too many compact body design and grip options. increase capacity or higher battery availability to reduce single point spurious battery failure. The users have the option to add additional grip and battery for redundant battery capability i.e. I know Nikon has long sourced Expeed from Fujitsu it would be interesting to have a discussion about how these stack up from different makers and when do they get away with a single chip and when they need two and so on and who has the best multicore. The comment above by thoughts R us raises yet another issue - ASIC chips.
UFPS VS REALISTIC FPS PREFAB UPGRADE
It's also easy to forget that for about a decade there Canon's manufacturing process on sensors was kind of behind the curve due to a mistimed investment in plant followed by years of resistance in the company against spending any more money on an upgrade (I guess if the product is still selling well and the imaging limitations are still manageable for customers, let's just wait until we get into trouble, eh?), and that's a separate issue, not impacting AF but definitely impacting dynamic range and noise. I think somewhere along the line the discussion jumped from imaging quality to sensor-based autofocus, where Canon has long been in really strong shape. So that's what we'll take a look at here: how these two high-end sports-shooting mirrorless cameras stack up in the hand, as well as on paper.
UFPS VS REALISTIC FPS PREFAB PROFESSIONAL
Instead it's a combination of technical capability and the experience of using the device that's most important (as well as professional support for these particular options). The spec similarities in resolution, autofocus capability and speed are uncanny.īut these days, competition between manufacturers isn't just about specs (regardless of how much their marketing departments want you to think so).
With an all-new 24MP stacked CMOS sensor and sophisticated autofocus algorithms, it's only natural to take a look at how it compares to Sony's a9 Mark II. It's the first truly action-focused mirrorless camera we've yet seen from Canon, and it looks like they've thrown an awful lot into it. We live in an age where even compact cameras have insane autofocus and burst speeds, and many midrange full-frame mirrorless cameras out there can capture bursts of images that put the sports DSLRs of yore to shame.Įnter the EOS R3. What a time to be a photographer, especially one who has their eyes and lenses set on photographing fast action.
0 kommentar(er)
